Often, the information is never even revealed to the public. In addition to gaining a massive amount of Trump information, the hackers also were able to read all email and chat traffic during their perusing.Īll political campaigns gather oppo information on opposing candidates to give them plenty of dirt to reveal at-will when the time calls for it. The group of elite hackers have also attempted to access other important government files and databases, but they struck gold when they gained access to the DNC’s server, particularly obtaining a wealth of information on the Democratic party’s opposition information on Donald Trump. Well all of that sounds pretty funny with the breaking news that the DNC has been an open book for Russian hackers for nearly a year now. Then the DNC overcorrected and barred one of the two Democratic candidates from having access to key voter information as a overzealous punishment. Without explanation, it continues to deny law enforcement access to its server.Does anyone remember the massive hubbub that surrounded the Democratic party back in late 2015 when it was revealed that a Bernie Sanders staffer had accessed the DNC voter database?Įstablishment elites ran around like headless chickens while Sanders quickly apologized and the staffer was removed from the campaign. For, when the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI learned of the hacking claim, they asked to examine the server. This has resulted in investigations by Congress and a special counsel into President Trump, his family, and his campaign staff for supposed collusion with the Russians.īut in their frenzied coverage, the media have downplayed the very odd behavior of the DNC, the putative target of the alleged hack. Since then, the mainstream media have created a climate of hysteria in which this unsubstantiated theory has been conjured into accepted truth. Thus was laid the cornerstone of the Trump-Russia-collusion conspiracy theory. Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton’s public relations chief, said in a Washington Post essay in March that she worked assiduously during the Democratic nominating convention to “get the press to focus on … the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help Donald Trump and hurt Hillary.” Clearly, the Clinton campaign needed to lessen the political damage. Much to the embarrassment of Hillary Clinton, the released files showed that the DNC had secretly collaborated with her campaign to promote her candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination over that of Bernie Sanders. He then posted online DNC computer files that contained metadata that indicated Russian involvement in the hack. The next day, a self-described Romanian hacker, Guccifer 2.0, claimed he was a WikiLeaks source and had hacked the DNC’s server. Two days later, CrowdStrike, a computer security company working for the Democratic National Committee, announced that it had detected Russian malware on the DNC’s computer server. On June 12, 2016, WikiLeaks announced that it would soon release stolen computer files that pertained to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. George Parry is a former state and federal prosecutor practicing law in Philadelphia. Will special counsel Mueller examine the DNC server, source of the great Russiagate caper? Parry explains how it was done and the implications. which conclusively proves that there was no hacking of the DNC computer and that the information was downloaded from within the DNC and then used to orchestrate a fake Russian hacking of the election. Is not False Accusation a crime? Especially when it is used for these political purposes? To undo a Presidential election?įormer federal prosecutor George Parry read the report by the association of Veteran Intelligence Professionals.
0 kommentar(er)
